TEST
YOUR GPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Nvidia

GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)

▲ 55789 ▼

Release date ≈ Q1 2017.

Average Bench: 28.8% (172nd of 714)

Based on 105,856 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 1C8C Model: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Poor: 21%Average: 28.8% Great: 31%

Popular builds with this GPU

Very poor average bench

The Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) averaged 71.1% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 36.8fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 38.1fps

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) is just 10%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 39.8fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 35.8fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 105,856 samples)
Rank 17228.8%
Min Avg Max
26.2 Lighting 36.8 40.4
30 Reflection 39.8 47.3
25.9 Parallax 35.8 41.5
30% 37.5 fps
Min Avg Max
27 MRender 36.5 38.6
26.9 Gravity 38.1 42
21 Splatting 25.3 28.2
26.4% 33.3 fps
User Benchmarks Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Asus(1043 18FE) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5222
30.3% Below average
Lighting 38.8
Reflection 46.9
Parallax 38
32% 41.2 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 26.6
28% 35.1 fps
Legend(17AA 39D0) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9125
29.6% Poor
Lighting 38.3
Reflection 38.5
Parallax 36.8
31% 37.9 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 25.3
27% 33.5 fps
Dell(1028 0798) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1169
29.5% Poor
Lighting 37.6
Reflection 39.7
Parallax 41.9
31% 39.7 fps
MRender 36.5
Gravity 40
Splatting 26.5
27% 34.3 fps
Device(1D05 1042) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.22
27.5% Poor
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 44.9
Parallax 33.5
29% 38 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 30.6
Splatting 25.4
25% 31.1 fps
Asus(1043 1A4E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.12
21.7% Poor
Lighting 25.4
Reflection 35.4
Parallax 30.1
21% 30.3 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 28.6
Splatting 22.9
24% 29.8 fps
Asus(1043 1A4E) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5763
21.4% Poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 32.7
Parallax 29.1
21% 29.1 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 27.3
Splatting 21.3
22% 28.5 fps
HP(103C 8259) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 552.22
4.71% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 7
Parallax 6.7
4% 6.27 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 5.4
6% 7.37 fps
105,856 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 67,512,389 GPUs tested

 Popular Cards (based on 105,856 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price
Hide stale prices
Dell(1028 0798) 9% 28% ± 3%
Acer(1025 1265) 9% 31% ± 2%
Legend(17AA 39FD) 6% 29% ± 3%
Legend(17AA 39D0) 6% 29% ± 2%
Dell(1028 0824) 5% 29% ± 1%
Dell(1028 086F) 5% 29% ± 3%
HP(103C 8478) 5% 29% ± 4%
Acer(1025 118B) 5% 29% ± 2%
Asus(1043 18FE) 4% 27% ± 4%
HP(103C 838F) 4% 28% ± 3%
MSI(1462 11C8) 3% 29% ± 3%
HP(103C 84DA) 3% 30% ± 1%
Asus(1043 15E0) 3% 27% ± 4%
Asus(1043 1590) 2% 29% ± 2%
Asus(1043 1071) 2% 28% ± 3%
Device(1D05 1042) 2% 31% ± 1%
Asus(1043 1B3E) 1% 28% ± 4%
HP(103C 8259) 1% 29% ± 1%
Acer(1025 1263) 1% 29% ± 4%
Acer(1025 1128) 1% 30% ± 1%
HP(103C 845E) 1% 27% ± 5%
MSI(1462 11C9) 1% 28% ± 2%
Acer(1025 1267) 1% 30% ± 1%
HP(103C 8469) 1% 28% ± 3%
Clevo(1558 850A) 1% 29% ± 2%
HP(103C 836B) 1% 23% ± 5%
MSI(1462 1219) 1% 31% ± 0%
Asus(1043 1041) 1% 28% ± 5%
Asus(1043 1A4E) 1% 31% ± 1%
Clevo(1558 852B) 1% 31% ± 0%
MSI(1462 1221) 1% 26% ± 5%
Acer(1025 1207) 1% 25% ± 5%
HP(103C 84F8) 1% 30% ± 0%
Acer(1025 1260) 1% 27% ± 5%
Dell(1028 0870) 1% 30% ± 1%
MSI(1462 121A) 1% 31% ± 0%
HP(103C 8392) 1% 28% ± 3%
Legend(17AA 39FC) 1% 31% ± 1%
Legend(17AA 77FE) 1% 29% ± 0%
Clevo(1558 651A) 1% 32% ± 1%
Asus(1043 182E) 1% 29% ± 0%
Clevo(1558 872B) 0% 30% ± 1%
Dell(1028 08EA) 0% 26% ± 7%
Dell(1028 07FA) 0% 30% ± 0%
Device(1D05 1044) 0% 30% ± 3%
Acer(1025 142A) 0% 30% ± 0%
Acer(1025 1199) 0% 30% ± 0%
MSI(1462 1222) 0% 30% ± 0%
Asus(1043 1920) 0% 29% ± 0%
Clevo(1558 55A1) 0% 29% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) Builds (Compare 5,380 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Dell Inspiron 15 7000 Gaming - $799

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples3,200x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples2,180x
GPU
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples1,999x
SSD
X400 M.2 2280 256GBSandiskBench 66%, 11,716 samples309x
THNSNK128GVN8 M.2 2280 128GBToshibaBench 54%, 5,253 samples293x
X400 M.2 2280 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 12,357 samples270x
RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples821x
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 1x16GBHynixBench 40%, 22,543 samples589x
M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 40%, 36,753 samples294x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Total price: $799

Popular GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 GPU Rankings

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
9,840

Liked (edit your comment) Add link

2 months ago.

GBR-User
Avatar level
5,786

Excellent

2 years ago.

Useless for anything other than watching YouTube videos

DEU-User
Avatar level
5,747

Terrible

16 months ago.

I have it and i use it and its very bad in games dont biy a gaming laptop with that graphic card i will upgrade soon to an RTX 3070 and it is for real 400% better than the GTX 1050 Ti mobile

RUS-User
Avatar level
4,784

Good

8 months ago.

MORE GAME HAVE 60fps(MAX QUALITI in FULL HD REZOLUTION). Best in the best for this money

IND-User
Avatar level
4,780

Good

4 months ago.

People are unnecessarily hating on this GPU. Honestly, it is not bad at all and will play most titles before 2018 at 720p/1080p at high settings, which is understandable considering that this GPU was released in 2017. I have played Forza Horizon 3 and GTA V and I was able to play both games with high settings with a great frame rate. Ofcourse this GPU will lag slightly for games released in 2023 but for a budget gamer it is still very capable. I have been using this GPU since 2017, and I service my laptop myself regularly and the GPU works fluidly. People with overheating issues, just clean the dust from your cooling fans for once and undervolt both CPU and GPU. There will be a HUGE difference in both temperature and performance (for the better).

BRA-User
Avatar level
4,647

Excellent

3 years ago.

This an amazing card if you want to play on laptop without spending a little forntune. I just can't understand negative comments. Of course there are much faster cards nowadays, but my GTX 1050 Ti is serving me so well for an year and a half. I high demand games I just ajust reducing useless grafics functions that I doens't even care about.

ROU-User
Avatar level
4,615

Good

10 months ago.

For a budget option still capable ish. I mean, I finished RDR2 with it with ultra textures, anything else low-medium 40fps, Metal Gear Solid 5 maxed out 60fps constant. Definitely go for atleast a 1650ti or 1660 if you can. Anything above is a waste imo.

FRA-User
Avatar level
4,573

Poor

14 months ago.

A good card with good performance. Unfortunately it overheats too much in my ASUS ROG FX753VD (It's probably a design flaw from the laptop, only one fan to cool down the CPU and GPU, both going up to nearly 90 degrees celsius before going in thermal throttling mode, decreasing the performance drastically.). I have the 4GB version which seemingly goes between the TI variant and the regular one in terms of performance.

POL-User
Avatar level
4,572

Excellent

7 months ago.

The dark age of gaming laptops where a $2k laptop could have such a crappy GPU like this one... For $2k, a gaming PC in the same years would perform much better!

VNM-User
Avatar level
3,711

Good

2 years ago.

It's like boneless meat, got it 2 years ago, still works like a charm :›

JPN-User
Avatar level
3,408

Good

3 years ago.

Back in 2017 it was pretty decent for a $900 laptop. But in 2020 it has aged so poorly to the point where it will not be able to run any new title even at low settings. Unless if you have a time machine, just completely skip this card at all costs.

PHL-User
Avatar level
3,372

Good

6 months ago.

It's actually a good card. It can play numerous games 2015-2016 games on 60 fps on Ultra. Even with its ups and downs, surprisingly it can run games like AC Unity, Call of Duty WW2, etc. The best games that this beast GPU can play is Overwatch at 100+ fps on Ultra with an i7 7700HQ. I suggest buying an Asus Strix GL553VE or anything that has this with an I7 7700HQ! It's awesome!

THA-User
Avatar level
3,172

Good

2 years ago.

Use it with a I5-8300H cpu, 16GB ram and a SSD. I am very happy with this setup and can recommend it for !

BEL-User
Avatar level
2,534

Terrible

15 months ago.

Great for overwatch fortnite and a lot of others games

basacararhan
Avatar level
318

Excellent

3 years ago.

Well, it shouldn't be in a 1000$ laptop but still an ok card. Can handle most of the games quite well.

RavenBailiff
Avatar level
314

Poor

4 years ago.

Pretty bad for a $1500+ laptop.

LordPoverty
Avatar level
22

Good

3 years ago.

While overall a relatively mediocre card in the grand scheme of things, for what I do, it does what it needs to. At the cost of quality and appealing features of a newer title, this card does what it needs to, even now. Great for older titles, such as CSGO, League, Overwatch (lower settings), Minecraft, etc.

JTJackal
Avatar level
4

Poor

3 years ago.

can handle a decent amount of games on low settings but is really not worth it. It lags on so many games including some of the oldest games it's horrible.

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 7 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Nvidia RTX 4060
vs Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti
vs Nvidia RTX 4070
vs Nvidia RTX 3060
vs Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti
vs Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)
vs Nvidia RTX 3070
vs Nvidia RTX 4090
vs Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti

714 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Computer Components FAQ
What is the UBM value for money rating?
What is UBM Effective Speed?
Thunderbolt speed?
Are USB 3.0 cables different?
Graphics Cards
How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs?
What are the UBM DX11 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX10 GPU tests?
What are the UBM DX09 GPU tests?
What is the Splatting GPU benchmark?
What is the Gravity (NBody) GPU benchmark?
What is the MRender GPU benchmark?
What is the parallax (POM) GPU benchmark?
What is the reflection (HDR) GPU benchmark?
What is the lighting (LDPRT) benchmark?
What is the GPU value for money rating?
What is the effective GPU speed index?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback